Which countries have policies favoring majority race?

Some countries not only adopt racial preferential policies, but make it legally enforceable. This is known as affirmative action. Affirmative action refers to policies that take factors including race, color, religion, sex, or national origin into consideration in order to benefit an underrepresented group in areas of employment, education, and business - so to promote the opportunities of the defined groups. It is often instituted in government and educational settings to ensure that minority groups within a society are included in all programs.

http://www.ohsu.edu/xd/about/services/affirmative-action-and-equal-opportunity/images/deanwestwood_1.jpg
The US, Canada and most European nations have affirmative act for disabled individuals

In many countries, the focus tends to be on ensuring equal opportunity for ethnic minorities. Among them, Brazilian universities have created systems of preferred admissions (quotas) for racial minorities (blacks and native Brazilians), the poor and people with disabilities. The Canadian Employment Equity Act requires employers in federally-regulated industries to give preferential treatment to four designated groups: women, people with disabilities, aboriginal people, and visible minorities.

Certain universities in the United States have the top-10% rule in order to add racial diversity and in response to falling minority enrollment. The rule favors minority Blacks and Hispanics against the higher-achieving Asians and Whites. India has a reservation system designed to improve the well-being of backward and under-represented communities especially those in the lower caste.


China and India have affirmative acts in favor of minority groups

In China, “preferential policies” required some of the top positions in governments be distributed to ethnic minorities and women. Also, many universities are dictated by government to give preferred admissions to ethnic minorities especially the Manchus, Hui, Tibetan and Uighur in expense of the majority Han Chinese. In New Zealand, the minority Maori or other Polynesians are often afforded improved access to university courses, or have scholarships earmarked specifically for them.

There are however, several countries who implemented policies in favor of its majority population instead, they are:


1. Israel

  • The Jewish Law of Return
    Favoring: The Jewish people

The Zionist political movement found in the 1880s successfully established Israel, currently the most developed country in the Middle East, as a state for the Jewish people, and stipulates that the demographics majority must always be maintained as Jewish. The Law of Return 5710-1950 was enacted by the Knesset, Israel’s Parliament, on July 5, 1950 which declares the right of Jews to come to Israel: “Every Jew has the right to come to this country as an oleh.”

The policy invites all Jewish diaspora around the world back into Israel, in hope to maintain the Jewish majority in Israel. Those who emigrate to Israel under the Law of Return are immediately entitled to citizenship. Israel on the other hand, has no apparent race-based economic policies as the Jewish people don’t seem to have any problem competing in an openly competitive environment. Despite its meritocratic system however, important and sensitive top government jobs are predominantly given to the Jews. The country’s demographics currently stood at 78% Jewish.


2. Malaysia

  • The New Economic Policy, evolved into National Development Policy
    Favoring: Bumiputra

Malaysia, (Malaya) once the wealthiest British colony in the East in early 20th century, is a multi-ethnic country, with Malays making up the majority at 50% of the population and other indigenous 11% - collectively known as Bumiputra. The remaining minorities include Chinese 24% and Indian 7%. Traditionally, the Bumiputra lags behind other groups in income and made up most of the bottom segment in the economic pyramid. To balance such socioeconomic disparity, the Malaysian government adopted the New Economic Model, implemented after a racial riot in 1969, which targeted a 30% share of the economy for the Bumiputra.

The policy aims to reduce the non-Malay share of the economy in relative terms, and increase that of the Bumiputra to a preset 30% goal, in it entitling the Bumiputra to discount on houses or property, preferential admission to government educational institutions, qualification for public scholarships, priority positions in government, and ownership of businesses. After more than 40 years, the share of Malaysian economy held by the Bumiputra increased from 2.4% in 1970 to around 20% according to government, though the goal of 30% target has not yet been achieved.

http://i40.tinypic.com/fmnsk1.jpg
3. Brunei

  • Melayu Islam Beraja
    Favoring: Rakyat Melayu

Under the British, Brunei was once the richest country in Asia, exceeding even Japan by GDP per capita. After independence, in late 1980s, the Sultan of Brunei launched the Melayu Islam Beraja concept, in it declared “Malays to forever be the dominant race in Brunei, Islam the official religion, and the monarch is to possess full executive authority in the country”. The national concept, incorporated as Brunei national ideology, defined Rakyat Melayu (Malay citizens), which made up 66% of the population, as one of the three main pillars of the country that will reign supreme in social and political affairs.

The ideology reserved important government positions, employment preferences in Government-Linked Companies (GLCs) and other public institutions, together with most financial and business grants exclusively to the Rakyat Melayu. Brunei’s national business acts also require certain business licenses to be co-registered with a Rakyat Melayu prior to approval. On the other hand, the Bruneian government refused to grant citizenship to over half of its locally-born non-Malay population, specifically the ethnic Chinese and Iban, effectively making more than 5% of its population ‘stateless’.


4. South Africa

  • The Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act
    Favoring: The Black people

Under the previous white minority government, South Africa became the largest economy in the African continent, with heavy discrimination towards the Blacks who made up its majority population at 79%. As the apartheid-era government gave complete political and economic control to the whites, the majority of businesses in South Africa were and are still owned by white people today. To correct such imbalances, the South African government decided to implement affirmative action campaign for the Blacks by forcing the formerly privileged white businesses to adopt racial policies in their management and employment representation.

The Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act reserves 80% of new jobs for Black people and favor black-owned companies. Each company is required to meet the minimum requirements in terms of representation by the Blacks, including equity ownership, representation at employee and management level, procurement from black-owned businesses and social investment programs. If a small business has greater than 50% black ownership, they qualify as 110% contributors towards Preferential Procurement.


Zimbabwe

  • 1992 Land Acquisition Act, 2007 Empowerment Bill
    Favoring: The Black people

Zimbabwe is a landlocked country, with agriculture and mining the two main drivers for the economy. Prior to independence, in the country formerly known as Rhodesia, the white minority dominated Zimbabwe’s political, economic and social hierarchy, taking with them an extensive areas of prime farmland reserved for white people only. At this time however, Zimbabwe was the ‘food bowl of Africa’, a model of modern mechanized agricultural powerhouse in Southern Africa.

In 1980, the Black nationalist government won independence for Zimbabwe and proceed to rectify the economic disparity held by the white farmers through redistributing the best farming lands to the majority Blacks. The 1992 Land Acquisition Act enabled the government to purchase or acquire white lands at unfavorable price for the sellers, to be redistributed to the Black people. This is followed by the 2007 Empowerment Bill that allowed the government to seize white-owned farming lands without compensation. As part of the empowerment policy, foreign multinationals must also cede 51% of their shares to local Black Zimbabweans.

ISA !!! Don’t raise racial disharmony sentiments. Even if you are totally right about it.

I guess this is modern slavery. Let the majority ride on minority.

Bro,

Where you found this article? Not written by you I hope, otherwise people accuse you of falsfying information. Please put the link and million thanks.

[quote=“mevotex”]Some countries not only adopt racial preferential policies, but make it legally enforceable. This is known as affirmative action. Affirmative action takes in factors like “race, color, religion, sex or national origin” into consideration or priority before making a final decision (usually favoring a particular group) Such policies are observed in employment and education to public contracting, economic, immigration and health programs.

Many countries such as Australia, Canada, New Zealand, USA, China, Brazil, Macedonia, Romania, Slovakia provide affirmative action to protect its minorities.

There are however, few countries who instead implement policies to ‘protect’ its majority population, among them are:

Nations enacted law favoring majority


Israel
The Jewish Law of Return
Favoring: The Jewish people

The Zionist political movement found in the 1880s successfully established Israel as a state for the Jewish people, and to fulfill such term the demographics majority must always be maintained as Jewish. The Jewish Law of Return defines that all Jews possessing an Oleh’s certificate shall become Israel nationals and allowed to immigrate to Israel. Such a certificate would almost automatically turn into Israeli citizenship upon arrival in Israel if so desired. The policy intends to invite all Jews around the world back into Israel, hoping to maintaining the Jewish majority in Israel. Israel has no apparent race-based economic policies as the Jewish people seems to have no problem competing intellectually in an openly competitive environment, however, despite its meritocratic system, important and sensitive top government jobs are predominantly given to the Jews. Israel demographics currently stood at 78% Jewish.

Side effect: Condemnation from Arab and wider world, Palestinian Intifada gave rise to suicide bombings.


Malaysia
The New Economic Model, evolved into National Development Policy
Favoring: Bumiputra

Malaysia majority ethnic group is the Malays. They are however, found to have far lower income than the other groups and make up most of the bottom segment in the economic pyramid. To balance such socioeconomic disparity, the Malaysian government adopted the New Economic Model, which targeted a 30% share of the economy for the Bumiputra. The policy aims to reduce the non-Malay share of the economy in relative terms, and increase that of the Bumiputras to a preset 30% goal, in it entitling the Bumiputras to discount on houses or property, preferential admission to government educational institutions, qualification for public scholarships, priority positions in government, and ownership of businesses. Along with the policy, the share of Malaysian economy controlled by the Bumiputra increased from 2.4% in 1970 to currently 19.3%

Side effect: Policy also applied to foreign companies, foreign investment and capital deterred, flow into neighboring Singapore instead, racial tension.


Brunei
Melayu Islam Beraja
Favoring: Rakyat Melayu

In early 1990s, the Sultan of Brunei launched the Melayu Islam Beraja concept, in it declared “Malays to be the dominant race, Islam to be official religion and the monarch is to have full authority”. The concept, portrayed as Brunei national ideology, defined Rakyat Melayu (Malay citizens) as one of the three main pillars of the country. The policy reserved important government positions, employment preferences in Government-Linked Companies (GLCs) & public institution, financial and business grants exclusively to the Rakyat Melayu. The national business acts require certain business licenses to be co-registered with a Rakyat Melayu prior to approval. The Brunei government refused to grant citizenship to 50% of non-Malays locally-born population, effectively making 10% of its population ‘stateless’.

Side effect: Government now employ 75% of the population, an unsustainable model. Lack of foreign investment and massive brain drain make country ASEAN worst performing economy since 1999.


South Africa
The Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act
Favoring: Blacks

South Africa is the largest economy in Africa, with 75% population as Blacks. However, as the former Apartheid government gave complete control to the Whites, the majority of companies in South Africa were and are still owned by white people. To correct such previous imbalances, the South African government decided to implement affirmative action campaign for the Blacks by forcing the formerly privileged white minority group to implement certain policies in business and employment. The Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment Act reserves 80% of new jobs for Black people and favors black-owned companies. Each company is required to meet the minimum requirements in terms of representation by previously disadvantaged groups, including equity ownership, representation at employee and management level, procurement from black-owned businesses and social investment programs.

Side effect: Massive brain drain, economic growth slowed (White-governed South Africa achieved 1810% GNP growth in 34 years while Black-governed South Africa 210% GNP growth in 16 years), 13% of the Whites now live under poverty.


Zimbabwe
1992 Land Acquisition Act, 2007 Empowerment Bill
Favoring: Blacks

As Zimbabwe is a landlocked country, agriculture is one of the main driver for the economy. Prior to independence, the white minority dominated Zimbabwe’s political, economic and social hierarchy, and extensive areas of prime farmland were reserved for white people only. The Whites however, built Zimbabwe into the ‘food bowl of Africa’. The Black nationalist government won independence for Zimbabwe in 1980s and proceed to rectify the economic disparity held by the White farmers through redistributing the best farming lands to the majority Blacks. The 1992 Land Acquisition Act enabled the government to purchase/acquire White lands at not-so-favorable price to be redistributed to the Black people. The 2007 Empowerment Bill allowed the government to seize White-owned farming lands without compensation.

Side effect: International sanction, the Whites have the experience and know-how to increase productivity on their land, by redistributing to the inexperienced Blacks only 8.3% farms of the country are operational now, Zimbabwe agriculture and economy collapsed, country went from African breadbasket to 45% population starving.

Sri Lanka
Policy of Standardization, Sinhala Only Act
Favoring: Sinhalese
Status: Act repealed

Indonesia
PP 10/1959, 127/U/Kep/12/1966, 1967 Basic Policy for the Solution of the Chinese Problem, Keppres No. 240/1867, Keppres No. No. 14/1967, SE-06/Pres.Kab/6/1967, TAP MPRS No. 32/1966, 37/U/IN/6/1967, 455.2-360/1988, 02/SE/Ditjen-PPGK/1988, Instructions No.3.462/1.755.6, SE-06/Pres-Kab/6/1967
Favoring: Pribumi
Status: 90% of Act repealed, law banning Chinese surname maintained[/quote]

Looks kinda true anyway…
We want facts not propaganda.So keep it coming with link or source so we can check it out.

you might be surprised a lots of articles are written by me. this post gathered information from over 40 sources and i don’t feel like tracing back all of them and post the links here.

but then, you know your best friends on the web 8) when i’m (i believe everyone too) really interested to verify some information online, i will take additional steps and efforts on my own to research the validity.

do it for what is posted above and you’ll find thousands, oh-no, million of pages on the topics. just in case you are lazy, there;

http://www.bing.com/search?q=The+Jewish … H&qs=n&sk=
http://www.bing.com/search?q=malaysia+N … E&qs=n&sk=
http://www.bing.com/search?q=melayu+isl … E&qs=n&sk=
http://www.bing.com/search?q=Broad-Base … k=&sc=1-42
http://www.bing.com/search?q=zimbabwe+l … k=&sc=1-17

why la so sensitive,…put this out, lalu la ISA…
common la, TS has his/her facts…let it be shared,and we know that it is true…so why ambik hati leh??

metovex, interesting issue raised here. The truth hurts but who ever said it never did rite? :wink:

btw, are you not worried Israel may send their Mossad agents after you posted this? :lol:

[quote=“SStormtrooper”]metovex, interesting issue raised here. The truth hurts but who ever said it never did rite? :wink:

btw, are you not worried Israel may send their Mossad agents after you posted this? :lol:[/quote]

hmm, not really, for some reason, unlike the rest of the countries who make it ‘too sensitive’ to discuss the particular issue, one difference israel has from the list is that it instead announce this law proudly to the world on its foreign affairs ministry website:

http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/MFAArchive/20 … rn-%201950

ah the irony,malaysia is following the country she supposedly hate…

Yeah, Truth really hurts :oops:

biasala 1malaysia ma…ayaaa…

following what? Israel have intellectuals, whilst we have morons and unsinkable sampan.

following what? Israel have intellectuals, whilst we have morons and unsinkable sampan.[/quote]

lol, a lot of people will see that as an insult

but then… one-quarter or 1/4 of planet earth (consisting of you-know-who countries) are anxious to remove Israel. It indeed takes very tough brain and intelligent to not only survive, but build it to currently having a high living standard near Hong Kong and New Zealand.

Israel
Population: 7.6 million
Universities in country: 8
No. of national universities in world’s top 500: 7

Singapore
Population: 5 million
Universities in country: 4
No. of national universities in world’s top 500: 2

Malaysia
Population: 28.3 million
Universities in country: 57
No. of national universities in world’s top 500: 0

:mrgreen:

Source: Academic Ranking of World Universities - 2010
http://www.arwu.org/ARWU2010.jsp

Israel is growing strong as i heard…
we should really stop these nonsense fighting and improve our living standards…

afterall…living well is what everyone hope for…